UCL · Dept of Information Studies × GIS Analytics · London

Your company already knows the answer. It just can't find it.

Small organisations, SMEs and NGOs, are the backbone of the economy, yet they have never had the decision intelligence the big players take for granted. Company Brain turns the knowledge you already have, meetings, emails, spreadsheets, the things in people's heads, into a connected map you can query, reason over and act on. With AI, you can compete.

Funded by UCL Innovation & Enterprise · Impact Acceleration Account
Demo graph · fictional organisation
21Decisions on record · each with its evidence trail
433People, clients, projects and facts mapped
538Connections between them
LivePilot in production at GIS Analytics

Figures from the pilot system running at GIS Analytics. The interactive graph on this page is a separate, fictional 52-entity demo.

§ 01 The project Knowledge exchange · Apr to Nov 2026

Institutional memory, with structure.

An eight-month knowledge exchange between UCL's Department of Information Studies and GIS Analytics, building the structure small organisations, SMEs and NGOs, are missing: a property graph of people, clients, projects, decisions, evidence and outcomes, extracted from the sources a business already produces.

The system, built by GIS Analytics on Neo4j and driven by natural-language skills, records not just what was decided but why: who proposed it, what evidence supported or contradicted it, what actions followed. Structural transparency, not bureaucratic overhead.

The result is decision-grade memory an SME or NGO can query in plain language, and an audit trail that assembles itself.

§ 02 The problem Evidence · fragmented across tools, people, memory

For a small team, scattered knowledge is not just untidy. It is the gap between you and an organisation many times your size. Here is what that gap is made of.

01

Knowledge fragmentation

Critical context lives in spreadsheets, email threads, meeting notes and individual memory. There is no canonical model, and no path between two facts.

Symptom · the same question asked five times
02

Decision opacity

Choices are made without visibility into prior context, the evidence that informed them, or the outcomes they produced. By the third quarter, nobody remembers what was traded against what.

Symptom · why did we decide that again?
03

Governance gap

Transparency and audit expectations are rising: the EU AI Act, procurement reviews, ISO. SMEs lack the infrastructure to meet them without diverting headcount to documentation.

Symptom · audit trail reconstructed in panic
§ 03 How it works Ingest · connect · decide · act · every stage leaves a trace
01Ingest

Capture signal.

Meeting transcripts, email threads, accounting exports, hand-written notes. Each source is broken into typed records, and every record keeps a link back to the document it came from: its provenance.

Intranscripts · emails · csv · pdf
Skill/ingest meeting.txt
Outtyped nodes + provenance
02Connect

Link structurally.

Nodes enter a Neo4j property graph with typed relationships. The model resembles the business, not a database.

Modelproperty graph · Neo4j
Edges20+ typed relations
State433 nodes · 538 edges
03Decide

Reason over context.

A question pulls every adjacent node: prior context, supporting and contradicting evidence. The recommendation arrives with its citations built in.

Inputquestion + scope
Skill/decide "should we ..."
Outdecision node + audit trail
04Act

Execute and trace.

Recommendations become actions: drafted emails, scheduled tasks, prioritised lists. Every outcome links back to the decision that produced it.

Actionemail · task · proposal
Rankedvalue · effort · urgency
Backoutcomes feed the graph
§ 04 The graph Interactive · demo organisation · static snapshot

One connected map of how the business runs.

This is the system's actual viewer, embedded live. It renders a fictional demo organisation from a static snapshot: people, clients, projects, decisions, evidence and the typed relationships between them.

Interactive demo · Demo organisation Hover a node · click to re-root · drag to move
Decision Context Evidence · supports Evidence · contradicts Agent Action · rec

About this data: the organisation shown is fictional and ships as a static snapshot. Real deployments run against the SME's own Neo4j instance, in their own environment and under their own control; nothing about a client business appears on this site.

§ 05 Use cases Four ways SMEs and NGOs use the graph
Use case · 01

Specific Q&A

Ask a question, get the answer with its evidence attached: who decided, when, and on what basis. Not a document search: the answer comes from what the company actually knows.

who approved the discount for this client, and on what evidence?
Use case · 02

Qualitative advice

Recommendations argued from the firm's own context: prior decisions, commitments, cash position, with supporting and contradicting evidence attached.

should we hire a second analyst this quarter?
Use case · 03

Simulations

See the knock-on effects before they happen: which projects, people and revenue are exposed, traced along the firm's real relationships rather than guesswork.

what breaks if we lose our largest client?
Use case · 04

Company check-up

A structured review of the graph itself: stale decisions, contradicted evidence, orphaned actions, concentration risk. The business, audited by its own structure.

what have we left unresolved?
See it on your own data

A working session with GIS Analytics takes one hour: we map a slice of your company into the graph, and you ask it questions.

Request a walkthrough
In the real world
The graph changed the way we see the whole operation. For the first time we can look at the entire ecosystem in one place, how our kitchens, projects and partners connect, and act on it.
Taz Khan MBE · Founder, London's Community Kitchen

GIS Analytics mapped London's Community Kitchen and its family of ventures, the café, the water brand, the youth academy and the climate hub, into a single knowledge graph, so a fast-moving charity network can finally see itself clearly.

§ 06 Decision audit Every decision keeps its receipts

Answers you can take to a review.

Each decision is a first-class node linked to its context, its evidence on both sides, the people involved and the actions that followed. The audit trail is not written after the fact; it is the shape of the data.

Why did we decide that again? Now the answer is one query, with the receipts attached.
The question every SME asks · third quarter, every year
dec-014 · demo organisation · approved Should we hire a part-time designer?
Context Three client projects need design work this quarter; no designer on staff.
Supports Outsourcing runs £2.4k per month against £1.8k for a part-time hire. Nearest client deadline: six weeks.
Contradicts Cash runway is four months; no confirmed design work after Q3.
Decision Hire part-time on a three-month contract. Proposed by the system, approved by the founder.
Actions Post the role by Friday · reallocate project budget · review at contract end.
Demo data · fictional organisation · every row is a node you can open in the viewer
§ 07 Technology Design choices · in plain language

Property graph, not RDF.

The data model treats nodes and relationships as first-class objects, each carrying properties of its own. It is close to how a founder describes their business: this client, on this project, with that contract.

The choice was made early, in consultation with the UCL team: property graphs trade some of RDF's semantic rigour for queryability, tooling maturity and a model the team can extend without recompiling an ontology.

Why this matters "Rank open recommendations by value over the last two quarters" is a single Cypher query in Neo4j. Expressing the same in RDF is possible, but takes substantially more modelling effort than a small firm can spare.
Graph DBNeo4j 5.x · property graph · Cypher
Skillsnatural-language skills · built with Claude Code
ReasoningGraph RAG · retrieval over typed structure
ViewerCanvas 2D · static JSON snapshot · no live database behind this site
Deployself-hosted · single tenant per organisation · data held under the organisation's own control
Toolkitopen-source release planned as a project output · 2026
§ 08 Team UCL Dept of Information Studies × GIS Analytics
Portrait of Prof. Antonis Bikakis
Prof. Antonis Bikakis
Principal Investigator
UCL · Dept of Information Studies
Portrait of Karen Stepanyan
Karen Stepanyan
Knowledge Exchange Facilitator
UCL · Dept of Information Studies
Portrait of Xingyuan Feng
Xingyuan Feng
Research Assistant · Doctoral Researcher
UCL · Dept of Information Studies
Portrait of Ilgaz Incedayi
Ilgaz Incedayi
Founder & Director
GIS Analytics Limited
§ 09 Outputs & timeline Apr 2026 → Nov 2026 · follow-on UKRI / Innovate UK applications planned
Apr · May 2026

Live system on real SME data

433 nodes, 538 relationships, 21 decisions on record, deployed in production at GIS Analytics.

● Shipped
Jun · Aug 2026

Open-source toolkit

The skills, ingest pipeline and property-graph schema prepared for open-source release. Documentation co-authored with UCL.

● In progress
Jul 2026 →

Second deployment · live

A London community-food charity now runs the system in production: early evidence the model generalises beyond the first pilot. Named case study to follow, with their permission.

● Live
§ 10 Contact Open to SMEs, NGOs · academics · funders

Talk to the team.

This is a knowledge exchange collaboration with a working system. If you run a small business, ask for the one-hour walkthrough: we map a slice of your company into the graph and you question it. Academic groups with adjacent work, and funders looking at this space: write to the PI or the project inbox.

Response window · about two working days